Part 2: Application
For the initial post, address the following:
How did you go about selecting topics for the position papers?
Reflect upon the research skills you have developed throughout this class. What key takeaways
have you learned regarding research strategies?
Compare your experiences with revision and feedback to those detailed in the Stewart (2016)
and Teller (2016) articles. Which stance do you lean towards and why? Did you incorporate
changes into your final essay based...
Read More
Archives
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 7 Assignment: Pro-Con Position paper
Instructions
This week, you will complete the final draft of your Pro-Con Position Paper. Review the
template provided and consider the feedback from your instructor and peers as you
make edits and finalize your work.
The final draft should apply the following:
An APA formatted title page
An attention grabbing introduction to draw in the audience
A well-written thesis that acknowledges both pro and con topics
A formal tone, avoiding both 1 st (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) and 2...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 7 Discussion: Revision Plan
Part 2: Application
Prior to beginning work on this reflection, refer to the feedback you have been given by
your instructor and peers over the past weeks plus any additional experiences you have
with the writing process covered in the course. Reflection is an important part of the
writing process. Examine how the writing process has been going for you with your
essay up to this point.
Then, explain the results of your paper review with your peers.
1. Detail the 3 most significant issues ...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 6 Assignment: Pro-Con Position Paper Draft – Instructor Review
Instructions
For this assignment, you will submit a draft of your paper to your instructor for review.
The essay draft should follow one of the two organizational patterns from the Week 5
lesson. Use the Pro-Con Essay Template (in Required Resources) to complete your
draft.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 4-5 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 5 scho...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments
Part 1: Research & Review
Review the two articles in Required Resources on the uses of logical fallacies and
rhetorical appeals in the healthcare field.
The Krishen and Bui (2015) article discusses the active use of logical fallacies to
manipulate obese consumers into making better health choices through two
oppositional approaches: fear tactics and positive reinforcement.
The Giachino, Stupino, Peratulo, and Bertoldi (2017) article presents a study of fear
tactics applied through...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL147 Week 6 Discussion 1: Rebuttals and Refutations
Part 1: Research & Review
Review this week's lesson and reading. Find an academic source to back up your
opposition's point of view. This is a new source, in addition to the source you located
last week.
Part 2: Application
Anticipating readers' objections is one way to determine what other sections to include
and support in your paper. Practice writing a counterargument that applies the Toulmin
model. Incorporate one of the new sources you have gathered to...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity
Initial Post Instructions
Part 1: Research & Review
Pay particular attention to the following as you review the Required Resources for this
activity:
Week 3 Lesson: Building Body Paragraphs section
Week 4 Lesson: Signal Phrases section
Website links
Then, choose one of the sources you have collected so far this term.
Part 2: Application
Draft a body paragraph for the upcoming pro/con position paper, incorporating one
paraphrase and one quote.
The paragraph should conta...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 5 Discussion 1: Annotations
Initial Post Instructions
This week's lesson presented a model of an annotated bibliography. Review the model,
focusing on the components of the entry:
Reference citation
Summary
Credibility
Assessment
Research a new source for your Pro-Con Position Paper (ideally, seek one that is in
opposition to your stance/side). Then, draft 1 reference entry and 2 paragraphs for this
new source.
Make sure to cite your source in APA format.
Follow-Up Post Instructions.
Respond to ...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 4 Assignment: Con-Position paper
Instructions
For this assignment, complete the following:
Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 3
Assignment (Con-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor
and/or your peers.
Compose a position paper representing the con side of your new topic. (See the Con-
Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:
o Introduction (with thesis statement)
o Context paragraph
o 3 body paragraphs (focusing ...
Read More
(Answered) ENGL 147 Week 4 discussion: Source Evaluation
Part 2: Application
Discuss how credible the source is using the CRAAP evaluation model. Detail as many of the 5 components as possible:
Currency: How up-to-date is the resource? Why is the date of publication important?
Relevance: How significant is the information in the resource to the topic? Is there a direct coalition to the subject matter? Is the source a primary or secondary source? What makes the source appropriate for an academic paper?
Authority: What makes the source credi...
Read More